Why I Believe that Duensing – Kippen’s Delivered “Legal Notices” on Behalf of PGS ASA are Crimes and therefore PGS ASA Owes SDK Millions of US Dollars!

Click on Images

PGS ASA and Duensing – Kippen want SDK to Fly Thousands of Kilometres from USA to Thailand to Testify in Thai about Legally Protected Public Disclosures Published in English Regarding a Company Governed by the Laws of England? But, Lawyers from PGS ASA, Duensing – Kippen, Watson Farley & Williams and Landau Law won’t even answer e-mails or Open Letters! A contract formed by Duensing – Kippen on behalf of PGS ASA, 11 November 2018, in Thailand states USA Federal Court, Harris County, Texas, USA as a resolution venue. Legal claims are filed in the Thai language and delivered to the address of a previous visa sponsor address in Thailand and not SDKs legal address. SDK believes that the 11 November 2018 signed agreements with PGS ASA and Carl Richards are fraudulent.
Transparency International. Roberto Martinez B. Kukutschka: Exporting Corruption

PGS ASA and Duensing – Kippen want SDK to Fly Thousands of Kilometres from USA to Thailand to Testify in Thai about Legally Protected Public Disclosures Published in English Regarding a Company Governed by the Laws of England? But, Lawyers from PGS ASA, Duensing – Kippen, Watson Farley & Williams and Landau Law won’t even answer e-mails or Open Letters! A contract formed by Duensing – Kippen on behalf of PGS ASA, 11 November 2018, in Thailand states USA Federal Court, Harris County, Texas, USA as a resolution venue. Legal claims are filed in the Thai language and delivered to the address of a previous visa sponsor address in Thailand and not SDKs legal address. SDK believes that the 11 November 2018 signed agreements with PGS ASA and Carl Richards are fraudulent.

Where does a Thai legal firm get the legal authority to litigate a contract dispute in Harris County, Texas on behalf of an English company (PGS Exploration (UK) Limited) governed by the laws of England? How is a contract formed in Thailand on behalf of and English company governed by the laws of England valid? What is the status of two contracts between SDK and PGS Exploration (UK) Limited governed by the laws of England that protect whistleblowing?
No lawyer involved in forming the terms and conditions of the contract signed by SDK in Thailand is licensed to practice law or form legal agreements valid under USA Federal or Texas US State law. I believe this is more fraudulent misrepresentation to intimidate SDK to sign an unlawful agreement under duress that takes away SDKs legal rights under English law. PGS ASA has its main regional North and South America offices in Houston, Texas, USA (Harris County). The directors of Petroleum Geo-Services Inc. are Chairman Jon Erik Reinhardsem, Gottfred Langseth, and Christin Steen – Nilsen. They all have access to qualified legal counsel as well as an obligation to abide by USA / Texas laws. If my publications are indeed defamatory, why can’t PGS ASA litigate in Houston, Texas? Documents and contract would not need to be translated. PGS ASA has sent no e-mails since John Francas’ , PGS ASA UK Head of Legal follow-up threats after SDK received Duensing – Kippen threats!
PGS ASA has an obligation to be truthful to investors and stakeholders. PGS ASA continued silence is misrepresentation. In July 2018, PGS ASA UK Head of Legal, John Francas published a fraudulent letter in response to a subject access request citing the General Data Protection Requirement (GDPR). Within this letter, PGS ASA referenced both the knowledge of SDK publications disparaging PGS ASA and also reiterated PGS ASA ability to act on the terms and conditions of the 5 December 2013 Settlement Contract. Why didn’t PGS ASA claim breach in the terms and conditions by SDK and didn’t directors have an obligation to protect the reputation of PGS ASA and its employees who were disparaged? SDK has claimed that his publications are protected public disclosure (whistleblowing) and therefore would not constitute a breach through the UK Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA). SDK has also claimed that the 5 December 2013 settlement contract was illegally proffered to deny him his legal right under English law and contract to file a grievance to his employer. SDK has published evidence that PGS ASA has provided misrepresentations to government agencie (UK Border Agency and Information Commissioner’s Office) and uttered defamatory forgeries to support the illegal settlement contract. PGS ASA continues to utter these forgeries as SDK personal data which is a human rights and criminal offense.
Two legal contract define the legal relationship between SDK and PGS ASA. PGS ASA subsidiary in England, PGS Exploration (UK) Limited sponsored foreign worker USA citizen SDK lawful employment in England with a Tier 2 visa. SDK dependent family members were also sponsored to legally reside in England during SDKs employment. The employment contract was governed by the laws of England. PGS ASA contracted the UK subsidiary of law firm Watson Farley & Williams to advise on the sponsorship and employment contract. My employment with PGS Exploration (UK) Limited was terminated through a settlement contract signed 5 December 2013 by SDK and PGS ASA representative. I have for some time alleged that the 5 December 2013 settlement contract is fraudulent. The 5 December 2013 contract was illegally proffered by PGS ASA to avoid the legally guaranteed grievance processes and to terminate a whistleblower under false pretenses through uttering forged defamatory documents that would be used in the USA to illegally blacklist SDK, the whistleblower and victime of PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams, and Landau Law perpetrated criminal conspiracy to defame and defraud SDK. PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams, and Landau Law all conspired to utter forged instruments and advance an illegal contract to terminate a whistleblower.
SDK visits to the Kingdom of Thailand have been on Tourist visa since February 2019. SDK is a USA citizen. Publications from 3 July 2015 – 15 October 2015 were published in the USA. Articles through mid-2016 were published while on tourist visa in Thailand as a USA citizen with legal address in the USA. PGS ASA is a client of Duensing – Kippen, a law firm in Thailand. PGS ASA has paid / bribed Duensing – Kippen to harass and threaten incarceration and extort money so that SDK would de-publish legal and protected public disclosure. PGS ASA, through Duensing – Kippen, is demanding that SDK participate in defrauding PGS ASA shareholders, UK, Norway, USA, and Thai government agencies, and of course the oil and gas industry stakeholders who are told through PGS ASA propaganda that the PGS ASA Board of Directors abide by the provisions of their published, by Norwegian legal requirement, annual Corporate Responsibility Report(s). PGS ASA intention is for truthful and legally protected content to be de-published so that PGS ASA can continue their disinformation campaign unabated by truthful whistleblowing. Responsible institutional investors should demand that the PGS ASA Board of Directors explain the often cited 25 October 2013 Memo along with the 2013 Responsibility Report CEO Letter penned by Jon Erik Reinhardsen. Demand the truth!
Number 1: PGS ASA 2019 Annual Report Shares More Disinformation to Investors ad Stakeholders to cover-up non-compliant and criminal acts.
Number 2: PGS ASA 2019 Annual Report Shares More Disinformation to Investors and Stakeholders to cover-up non-compliant and criminal acts.
Number 3: PGS ASA 2019 Annual Report Shares More Disinformation to Investors and Stakeholders to cover-up non-compliant and criminal acts.
Number 4: PGS ASA 2019 Annual Report Shares More Disinformation to Investors and Stakeholders to cover-up non-compliant and criminal acts.
Number 5: PGS ASA 2019 Annual Report Shares More Disinformation to Investors and Stakeholders to cover-up non-compliant and criminal acts.
PGS ASA is the client for Duensing – Kippen who know – have been informed through several e-mails from SDK – that SDK regards his publications as evidence based legally protected public disclosure (whistleblowing) and that he believes that PGS ASA has defrauded and defamed SDK through continued uttering of forged documents that were used to terminate the employment of SDK under false pretenses and then blacklist him from professional employment in the marine seismic industry for identifying and reporting unethical and illegal exective behaviors by PGS ASA executives. Duensing – Kippen is a co-conspirator in fraud, defamation, blackmail and extortion meant to silence the victim of crimes and whistleblower and depublish SDKs legal and protected public disclosure. Duensing – Kippen have never conducted legal and responsible due diligence and otherwise do not possess the legal authority to breach legal contract governed by the laws of England on behalf of an English company misusing the Thai legal system.
When firms / individuals are paid to break the law and they know that they are breaking the law it is a bribe. Watson Farley & Williams, Landau Law, and Duensing – Kippen must explain the contents of SDKs PGS ASA professional personnel file. Lawyers from these companies must show that legal and compliant processes and documentation were used to terminate SDK. SDK is CONFIDENT that these firms cannot do this and that they have all participated in crimes against SDK, his family, UK, Norway, USA, and Thai government agencies, as well as all global oil and gas industry stakeholders and investors who rely on PGS ASA publications to be truthful.

Landau Law is aware of SDK litigation in Thailand because Landau Law tried to have SDKs Trustpilot review de-published.

PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams and Landau Law lawyers and human resources personnel who participated uttering defamatory forged documents documents used to support the 5 December 2013 termination settlement contract which illegally terminated the employment of a whistleblower and victim of crimes SDK under false pretenses know the claims filed in Thailand are false. They are legally ridiculous. The original employment contract terms and conditions are governed by the laws of England. SDK is a USA citizen whose Tier 2 work permit was sponsored by PGS Exploration (UK) Limited that had to meet a legal requirement to fill the position from outside the local labor force. SDK had to possess skills, experience and abilities that local hires did not possess. The documents being processed by PGS ASA do not comport to the legal standard required to sponsor a foreign (non-EEA) employee. This is why PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams and Landau Law invoking the non-disparagement clauses is avoided. PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams and Landau Law, all UK / English companies/subsidiaries avoid the English legal system through prosecuting false claims in Thailand.
PGS ASA through Duensing – Kippen is demanding thousands of USA dollars for their claim! SDK has never received the actual claims delivered in 2019 to the address of Thai relatives. The claims are in the Thai language as well. Can Lars Mysen, PGS ASA General Counsel or John Francas, PGS ASA UK Head of Legal read and comprehend Thai? Duensing – Kippen have no first-hand knowledge of the events which SDK writes about and publishes. Any evidence would be in the English language. This is then translated into Thai. Why is this necessary? PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams and Landau Law are obfuscating their legal claim by using a foreign language. Thai is not the language of legal documents formed for a company obligated to follow the laws of England. Extortion is a sub-category of blackmail under English criminal law. Where does PGS ASA get any legal authority to prosecute using the laws of the Kingdom of Thailand? PGS ASA has no subsidiaries in Thailand and no legal agreement between SDK even if the did! PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams and Landau Law want evidence based allegations of crimes depublished. They have bribed Duensing – Kippen to harass and blackmail / extort SDK.
PGS ASA through Duensing – Kippen is demanding thousands of USA dollars for their claim! SDK has never received the actual claims delivered in 2019 to the address of Thai relatives. The claims are in the Thai language as well. Can Lars Mysen, PGS ASA General Counsel or John Francas, PGS ASA UK Head of Legal read and comprehend Thai? Duensing – Kippen have no first-hand knowledge of the events which SDK writes about and publishes. Any evidence would be in the English language. This is then translated into Thai. Why is this necessary? PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams and Landau Law are obfuscating their legal claim by using a foreign language. Thai is not the language of legal documents formed for a company obligated to follow the laws of England. Extortion is a sub-category of blackmail under English criminal law. Where does PGS ASA get any legal authority to prosecute using the laws of the Kingdom of Thailand? PGS ASA has no subsidiaries in Thailand and no legal agreement between SDK even if the did! PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams and Landau Law want evidence based allegations of crimes depublished. They have bribed Duensing – Kippen to harass and blackmail / extort SDK.
I believe that Duensing – Kippen misrepresented legal and protected public disclosure as criminal defamation in Thailand. This is fraud. PGS ASA and SDK have a contractual legal relationship governed by the laws of England. PGS ASA has never cited breaches in the Confidentiality terms and conditions that protect against the publication of disparaging content by parties of the contract. SDK has claimed to be a whistleblower for several years. PGS ASA also misrepresented SDK published content on social media, LinkedIn and Twitter, to be defamatory and not truthful protected public disclosure. These defamatory claims to social media administrators got SDK restricted from LinkedIn and Twitter. PGS ASA has never stated exactly what is defamatory. PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams, Landau Law and Duensing – Kippen have never commented nor explained a 25 October 2013 Memo which SDK claims is an uttered defamatory forged documents used to illegally terminate a whistleblower on false pretenses.
SDK owned domain nopgs.com was stolen and evidence destroyed during arbitration with Duensing – Kippen lawyer Tippaya Moonmanee in December 2018. Duensing – Kippen services was sponsored by PGS ASA executives Rune Olav Pedersen, PGS ASA CEO and President, Gottfred Langseth, PGS ASA CFO and EVP, and Christin Steen – Nilsen, PGS ASA SVP Chief Accountant who act as directors for English company, PGS Exploration (UK) Limited. Carl Richards, former PGS Exploration (UK) Limited secretary sponsored his own claim as an individual. In September 2018, two summons for criminal defamation in Thailand were delivered to SDK while he traveled outside Thailand to his visa sponsors address in Thailand. PGS ASA and SDK shared a legal relationship (two contracts) governed by the laws of England. Carl Richards and PGS ASA were demanding that I remove / depublish content that I regarded to be legal and protected public disclosure, or whistleblowing. My content was not defamatory by legal definition. I regarded the litigation in Thailand to be blackmail / extortion. Much of the content had been published for more than one-year and was protected through the UK Limitation Act 1980. Most of the content had been provided to PGS ASA by e-mail to PGS ASA compliance or social media directly (Twitter @PGSNews). No comment nor complaint of violating contractual non-disparagement clauses were ever cited prior to the Thai criminal claims. The main objective of the Thai criminal claims was the depublishing of content and the destruction of evidence of PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams, and Landau Law illegal acts perpetrated against SDK and his Thai family.
On 20 September 2013, SDK submitted a workplace grievance describing breaches in contract, as well as unethical and unlawful behavior by executives. The grievance was in response to a letter written 24 July 2013 on behalf of the company, PGS Exploration (UK) Limited. At the time when the grievance was submitted to PGS ASA Compliance Terje Bjolseth, SVP Global Human Resources and Per Arild Reksnes, Marine Contract EVP, Rune Olav Pedersen, PGS ASA General Counsel, served on the compliance team. PGS Exploration (UK) Limited directors were Jon Erik Reinhardsen, PGS ASA CEO & President, Gottfred Langseth, PGS ASA CFO & EVP, and Christin Steen – Nilsen, PGS ASA SVP Chief Accountant. On 24 July 2013, PGS Exploration (UK) Limited secretary was PGS UK lawyer, Candida Pinto. On 13 September 2013, PGS UK lawyer, Carl Richards became PGS Exploration (UK) Limited secretary. Within the 20 September 2013 submitted grievance, I claimed that the 24 July 2013 letter written on behalf of PGS Exploration (UK) Limited and signed by PGS UK Human Resources Manager, David Nicholson, was defamatory. The letter was malicious and did not follow prescribed PGS ASA UK policy and procedures and therefore the contents was not protected by any qualified privilege.
SDK owned domain was stolen during arbitration with Duensing – Kippen lawyer Tippaya Moonmanee. Duensing – Kippen was sponsored by PGS ASA executives Rune Olav Pedersen, PGS ASA CEO and President, Gottfred Langseth, PGS ASA CFO and EVP, and Christin Steen – Nilsen, PGS ASA SVP Chief Accountant who act as directors for English company, PGS Exploration (UK) Limited. PGS Exploration (UK) Limited is physically located in England and operates under the obligations of the UK Companies Act 2006. SDK, a USA citizen, was sponsored for employment by PGS Exploration (UK) Limited under contract governed by the laws of England. Under law and contract, SDK had the legal right (obligation?) to publicly disclose unethical and illegal behavior. On 20 September 2013, SDK submitted a workplace grievance describing breaches in contract, as well as unethical and unlawful behavior by executives. I believe that my workplace grievance met the criteria set out by the UK Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA) for protected public disclosure – whistleblowing. PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams and Landau Law bypassed legally protected grievance process and uttered defamatory forged documents to support an illegal termination (retaliation) for whistleblowing. Then PGS Exploration (UK) Limited Company Secretary, Carl Richards also sponsored claims as an individual. I believe that this is fraudulent misrepresentation intended to threaten me with two claims instead of one. SDK signed two contracts to avoid two criminal complaints in Thailand.

SDK blew the whistle to JOGMEC who was negotiating a long term contract with PGS ASA for lease of Ramform Sterling at the time.

PGS ASA and Carl Richards Stole My NOPGS.COM Domain – I want it back!

PGS ASA has not followed any of there policy and compliance guidelines. PGS ASA never cited SDK for a breach of contract for the many blog post articles posted on LinkedIn Pulse nor the many comments written within PGS ASA LinkedIn comment space because SDK never breached the terms and conditions. The 5 December 2013 Settlement Contract was an illegally proffered contract used to illegally terminate a USA citizen foreign worker whistleblower. The 5 December 2013 Settlement Contract was supported by uttered forged documents. This is all serious criminal behavior perpetrated by bribed lawyers who ruin the legal profession. PGS ASA did publish this response to my several comments and articles. This is PGS ASA BEING ALLOWED TO LIE TO INVESTORS and STAKEHOLDERS because the Board of Directors is corrupt and supported by a dysfunctional Narcissistic Norwegian Corporate Governance system. Demand a third party investigation of PGS ASA Board of Directors and Executive Management Team from 2013 – 2020. Jon Erik Reinhardsen’s corrupt and criminal management directs Equinor and Telenor. PGS ASA corruption robs investors and Norwegian citizens. I refuse to not continue to my fight for truth and justice. I refuse to accept that my daughters will enter a working world where dishonest and abusive criminals such as Walter Qvam, Jon Erik Reinhardsen, Rune Olav Pedersen, Christin Steen-Nilsen, Gottfred Langseth, Per Arild Reksnes, Berit Osnes, Simon Cather, Terje Bjolseth, and David Nicholson are not punished for their voilence against my family. The PGS ASA Board of Directors and Executive Team, since at least 2013, has been destroying a good company through corrupt robbery, fraud, bribery, and embezzlement. If these incompetent narcissistic fuckheads don’t go to jail, what criminals do? Cowardly criminal Jon Erik Reinhardsen is really the best Norway can do for Equinor and Telenor? All I have ever requested is a real evidence based investigation. I will make it my life work to expose corrupt Norway to the world until there is justice for victims of crimes and whistleblowers!

###