15375 Memorial Dr, Ste. 100, Houston, TX, 77049-4138
PGS Exploration (UK) Limited [PGSUK] Bypassed Previous Contracts and took N0 ACTION. PGS UK Never Cited Breaches in non-Disparagement Clauses Inclusive of Contracts Governed by the Laws of England as Late as 16 July 2018. PGS ASA / PGS UK Instead Cited Breaches in Thai Criminal Law in September 2018?
Original Employment Contract, 27 September 2010, Governed by the Laws of England, References Confidentiality Terms to Protect PGS ASA from DisparagingPublications
Termination Settlement Contract Signed 5 December 2013
2018 GDPR Subject Access Request (SAR) Refusal to Respond
The 2018 SAR requested PGS ASA comment regarding any processing with regard to my publications and queries made within the content. The response by PGS UK Head of Legal, John Francas, on behalf of PGS ASA, also misrepresents PGS an my data protection history. A subject access request was also made in 2016 through the PGS Compliance. Rune O Pedersen was PGS ASA General Counsel at the time. Pedersen was provided with several published articles which also claimed PGS ASA executive and board of directors non-compliant and criminal behavior. These e-mails were forwarded to PGS ASA Data Protection Officer, Daphne Bjerke, with the 2018 SAR.
PGS ASA continued to contend that the 5 December 2013 termination settlement contract (TSC) is still valid as late as 16 July 2018. Many of my articles had contended that the TSC was a fraudulent instrument supported by forged documents. In September 2018, less than two (2) months later and over three (3) years after my first online published whistleblowing post, PGS decides to forward a claim citing Thai criminal law? How can the data subject and former employee notbe in breach of the TSC but be in violation of criminal defamation in Thailand?
PGS Exploration (UK) Limited (England) Company Directors and Head of Legal’s Selected Contract Jurisdictions are both the Kingdom of Thailand and Harris County, Texas, USA. Not England?