17 May 2020 SDK to PGS ASA, Duensing – Kippen, and Watson Farley & Williams

from:Steven Kalavity 
to:[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
Carl Richards <[email protected]>,
GDPR <[email protected]>,
John Francas <[email protected]>,
Tippaya Moonmanee <[email protected]>
date:May 17, 2020, 8:47 PM
subject:Another Request for PGS ASA Sponsored Thailand Legal Claims against SDK
E-mail Header
My Philip Landau and Watson, Farley & Williams (WFW) London Solicitors Testimonial ( 8 November 2016 updated 9 April 2017 )
Watson Farley & Williams advised PGS ASA on two contracts with SDK governed by the laws of England. SDK believes PGS ASA breached the first one and the second one was illegally proffered and supported by uttered forged documents. Now PGS ASA is retaliating against a USA foreign worker whistleblower using the laws of Thailand?

Another Request for PGS ASA Sponsored Thailand Legal Claims against SDK

PGS ASA / John Francas,

I continue to await delivery of the PGS ASA sponsored criminal and civil claims which were processed and delivered through Duensing – Kippen, a law firm practicing in the Kingdom of Thailand, which have caused so much trauma and damage to my reputation and the health and welfare of SDKs family.

As recently as 23 April 2020, PGS ASA sent an e-mail stating that SDK was in breach of the 11 November 2018 Compromise Agreement which was signed under threat of criminal and civil prosecution in Thailand.  PGS ASA has claimed that an arrest warrant has been issued for SDK that impedes his safe travels in and out of the Kingdom of Thailand. 

PGS ASA and the contract advisors, Watson Farley & Williams, refuse to clarify the status of the two contracts between SDK and PGS ASA UK subsidiary, PGS Exploration (UK) Limited.  However, the processing of SDK personal data to forward claims in Thailand that are intended to harm SDK constitute a material breach by PGS ASA of the Confidentiality terms and conditions of the 5 December 2013 termination settlement contract (the “Settlement Contract”), Clause 9.7.

Also, PGS ASA not acting on the Confidentiality Clauses relevant to the 2010 employment contract, as described in section 2.9 Confidentiality of the PGS UK Office Personnel Handbook (v. 01/2013) (the “Handbook”) constitute a material breach in fiduciary duty by directors and secretary of PGS Exploration (UK) Limited.  Failure by directors and secretary to invoke the terms and conditions within section 2.9 in a timely manner caused significant damage to the reputation and value of PGS ASA. 

PGS Exploration (UK) Limited directors and secretary also were in breach of their fiduciary responsibilities in their not abiding by Handbook procedures in processing SDKs legal right to submit a grievance, w SDKs and his family health and safety at risks through not following policy, not abiding by policy in dealing with claims of harassment, bullying, and discrimination and ignoring employee stress due to a toxic workplace, thus abdicating their Duty of Care responsibilities to provide a safe and healthful work environment.  PGS ASA also intentionally deceived UK Border Agency with regard to their legal sponsorship responsibilities of a Tier 2 visa holder and his dependent family members.

PGS ASA Compliance have also breached their responsibilities through not responding to numerous bona fide whistleblowing complaints since the signing of the unwarranted and illegally supported Settlement Contract.  PGS ASA has breached their legal responsibilities by perverting the course of justice and mishandling such complaints.  PGS ASA and their legal counsel denied SDK his rights under English law and contract.  PGS ASA also denied SDK his legal right to see and correct personal data being processed in his name.  In fact, on 4 December 2013, during “without prejudice” discussions, SDK stated as a condition for signing the Settlement Contract being assured that data was true and accurate.  PGS ASA and Watson Farley & Williams misrepresented SDKs legal right under the UK Data Protection Act 1998 to correct personal data to see and correct his personal data.  PGS ASA stated that it was their data and would not alter nor redact any of it.

Most of the publications that PGS ASA seeks to have unpublished relate to the personal data that PGS ASA processed to support the Settlement Contract.  Following SDK submission of a subject access request citing the UK Data Protection Act, he learned of the deceit that transpired during the negotiations from 1 November 2013 – 4 December 2013.  Again, SDK requested that PGS ASA correct his personal data.  However, following several complaints, PGS ASA sent a letter addressing certain of SDKs concerns and stated that PGS ASA would alter SDK personal data through the inclusion of a 5 December 2014 e-mail sent to PGS ASA describing the several defamatory and false documents PGS ASA was processing as SDKs personal data.  This PGS ASA alteration of SDK data to include the 5 December 2014 SDK e-mail is an acknowledgement that PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams, and even SDKs “legal” counsel, LZW Law, knowingly misrepresented the integrity of SDKs personal being processed to support the Settlement Contract.  In other words, there was a conspiracy to defraud the victim of workplace discrimination and abuse to illegally terminate his employment under false pretenses uttering forged defamatory documents.  PGS ASA Board of Directors and Compliance were completely vested in all of these violent and illegal actions against an employee who acted on his legal right by law and contract to submit a workplace grievance (20 September 2013 grievance referenced in the Settlement Contract, Clause 5.5).

PGS ASA breached the 2010 employment contract and then used a fraudulent Settlement Contract to escape accountability for their multiple breaches in fiduciary duty.  Since the publication of the 2013 PGS ASA Responsibility Report and their joining the UN Global Compact, PGS ASA has engaged in a deceptive disinformation campaign to avoid invoking the Confidentiality terms and conditions and instead pervert the course of justice and continue their violent fraud and defamation of a whistleblower, again acting under his rights under by contract governed by the laws of England, but also the laws of Norway that should have guided all decisions and actions taken against SDK. 

It is incumbent upon PGS ASA to address all published allegations and provide their side of the dispute for all stakeholders to evaluate under the laws of Norway and England first and then explain the criminal defamation claims filed in Thailand against a whistleblower.  It is the duty of PGS ASA and PGS Exploration (UK) Limited directors and secretary.  PGS ASA is beholden to carry out their fiduciary duty and behave ethically and in accordance to the laws, values, and code of conduct which forms PGS ASA promises and commitments to shareholders, customers, and employees. 

Regards,

SDK

###

14 May 2020 Email SDK – PGS ASA & Duensing – Kippen Thaliand Claim Documents

to:John Francas <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
GDPR <[email protected]>,
Carl Richards <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
Tippaya Moonmanee <[email protected]>
cc:[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected]
date:May 14, 2020, 2:18 PM
subject:Thaliand Claim Documents
E-mail Header

PGS ASA / John Francas,


I still await the legal claims and notices which were processed through PGS ASA and delivered by Duensing – Kippen. 
Through e-mail, PGS ASA has essentially endorsed the delivery of the legal claims and notifications.   


On 23 April 2020, PGS ASA / John Francas e-mailed that I was in “breach” of the 11 November 2018 compromise agreement that I signed in Thailand.  For several weeks, apparently, documents were delivered to the home of my Thai relatives.  However, I have asked several questions through e-mails from June 2018, and especially following the delivery of summons’ by e-mail in September 2018.
Why has PGS ASA refused to respond to these e-mails?  Now that I am in the USA, PGS ASA refuses to deliver claims to me.  What is PGS ASAs intention, really.  How does PGS ASA see the issues within the claims being resolved if they are never delivered and presented to the “defendant”?  


I want to resolve potential travel restrictions in or out of Thailand in the future.  I need PGS ASA to responsible respond.


Regards,

SDK

###

12 May 2020 E-mail to Norway’s PGS ASA Regarding Refusal to Provide Documentation for (Blackmail) Thailand Litigation

Why I believe the Criminal Defamation Claim brought forth by Carl Richards, former PGS Exploration UK Limited, England, KT13 0NY, Secretary, is Fraudulant (7 August 2019)
to:John Francas <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
cc:GDPR <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
[email protected],
Carl Richards <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
Tippaya Moonmanee <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
date:May 12, 2020, 6:06 PM
subject:PGS ASA Thailand Notices and Claims delivered by Duensing – Kippen
John Francas, PGS UK Head of Legal, Ignorance and the Fraud of Omission
The law of blackmail s.21 Theft Act 1968 (UK)
Philip Landau, London Employment Law Solicitor, Represented a Tier 2 Visa Holder?
Philip Landau, Landau, Zeffert & Weir (now Landau Law) was engaged by SDK to represent him on his grievance. Landau was complicit in uttering forged documents to support the fraudulent termination of a whistleblower. I have alleged that Landau and Watson Farley & Williams were bribed by PGS ASA.
OHN Report Withheld from me During Negotiations while Philip Landau was Engaged as my Counsel/Solicitor. This OHN Report is not being processed as my personal data. I submitted a subject access request to the OHN. Rune Olav Pedersen was PGS ASA General Counsel at the time.
Petroleum Geo-Services (PGS) Mob Gaslighting (30-Jun-2016)
Workplace Mobbing is Psychological Terrorism
OHN Report Withheld from me During Negotiations

05 December 2014 E-mail SDK to PGSUK – DPA SAR

###

A Whistleblowers Response to PGS ASAs UK Head of Legal, John the “Fuckhead”, Blackmail

PGS ASA Cannot Commit on which Illegal Contract to Tie Vexatious Litigation to!

Unanswered Open Letters to PGS ASA
John Francas <[email protected]>
cc:[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
Carl Richards <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
Tippaya Moonmanee <[email protected]>,
Steven Kalavity <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
[email protected],
ro[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected]
A SHORT LIST OF NAMED PGS ASA CODE OF CONDUCT VIOLATORS WHO ARE MORALLY WEAK CO-CONSPIRATORS TO ILLEGAL WHISTLEBLOWER RETALIATION, FRAUD, DEFAMATION, EXTORTION, & FORGERY. OTHERS HAVE RETIRED IN DISGRACE NEVER ONCE DEFENDING THEIR “REPUTATIONS”
Petroleum Geo-Services (PGS) Markets and the Anonymous Executive (9-Feb-2016)
Every time PGS ASA deleted SDKs LinkedIn comments, PGS ASA violated their social contract and defrauded shareholders and stakeholders. PGS ASA defecated on the principles of the UN Global Compact. Every deletion was breach of the original contract of employment and defamation of the whistleblower by the corrupt PGS ASA Board of Directors. PGS ASA Core Values, Code of Conduct, and Confidentiality terms and conditions form part of every employee’s contract. But, a corrupt PGS ASA Board of Directors rewards those who breach their contracts and help them maintain corrupt power and continue to deceive the oil and gas industry customers and investors.

PGS ASA UK and SDK 5 December 2013 Termination Settlement Agreement

USA FBI – THAI POLICE : PLEASE INVESTIGATE DUENSING – KIPPEN; WATSON, FARLEY & WILLIAMS; & PGS ASA CORRUPTION (2 February 2020)
Duensing – Kippen sent “Legal” Notice to SDK 15 May 2018. There were no further communications between Carl Richards or Duensing – Kippen until Criminal Defamation Claims were delivered September 2018
Norway’s PGS ASA Adheres to the Corporate Governance Code of Malpractice (11 September 2019)

LINK TO LINKS to Legally Protected Public Disclosure about PGS ASA

###

PGS ASA is not Responsible, Compliant nor Ethical

Equinor – Investigate your Chairman of the Board Nominee (3 June 2019)
USA FBI – THAI POLICE : PLEASE INVESTIGATE DUENSING – KIPPEN; WATSON, FARLEY & WILLIAMS; & PGS ASA CORRUPTION (7 February 2020)
Philip Landau, London Employment Law Solicitor, Represented a Tier 2 Visa Holder?
SDK Response to PGS ASA Notice of breach of Compromise Agreement (24 April 2020)
PGS ASA Capital Markets Fraud and the Art of Bribing Lawyers
Articles about Norway’s Equinor (StatOil) Corrupt Chairman of the Board, Jon Erik Reinhardsen
Norway’s StatOil Corruption Perception Delusion and Moral Turpitude (21 March 2018)

PGS ASA LAWYERS and HR PERSONNEL FRAUDULENTLY WITHHOLD INFORMATION

Petroleum Geo-Services #PGS #CEO #Pedersen and the Management of Gang Rape (24 October 2017)

·         Second Open Letter to PGS Exploration UK Limited Directors Rune Olav Pedersen, Gottfred Langseth, Christin Steen-Nilsen, Carl Richards and UK Serious Fraud Office (15-Oct-2018)

·         Open Letter to PGS Exploration UK Limited Directors Rune Olav Pedersen, Gottfred Langseth, Christin Steen-Nilsen and UK Serious Fraud Office (9 Oct 2018)

·         Letter to UK Companies House and Carl Richards, former PGS Exploration UK Limited Secretary (1-Oct-2018)

·         Letter to Gareth Jones, PGS Exploration UK Ltd. and ICO Caseworkers (16-Sep-2018)

·         Letter to Daphne Bjerke, Petroleum Geo-Services ASA (PGS) Data Protection Officer and ICO Caseworker (2-Sep-2018)

·         Dear Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) Caseworker (1-Jul-2018)

·         Open Letter to Board of Directors (18-Jun-2017)

PGS ASA Capital Markets Fraud and the Art of Bribing Lawyers
An American, the UK Data Protection Act, Petroleum Geo-Services (PGS) and the Tyranny of “Accurate Data” [3 July 2015]

###

Norway’s PGS ASA Exports Whistleblower Retaliation to Thailand

PGS ASA Retaliated Against a Foreign Worker Whistleblower through Misrepresenting Legal Protected Disclosure as Criminal Defamation through Thailand Law Firm Duensing – Kippen

NoPGS.org [NO Psychopaths in Geo-Services]
Why do so many incompetent men become leaders? | Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic | TEDxUniversityofNevada

PGS ASA (PGS) delivered notice to former employee, Steven D. Kalavity (“SDK”) that he was in breach of a compromise agreement signed in Thailand 11 November 2018 (the “Thai Agreement”).  For the past several months PGS has hired Thailand legal firm, Duensing – Kippen to deliver harassing legal notices to the residence where SDK stayed in Thailand while on visa.  SDK is a USA citizen and never had the legal permission to remain in Thailand indefinitely.  SDK informed PGS ASA that he was no longer living in Thailand 4 July 2019.  Nevertheless, the harassing legal notices continued to be delivered to the physical address of traumatized Thai relatives even though the Thai Agreement only specified an e-mail address for communication.  SDK has always rejected the validity of the totally unnecessary Thai Agreement.  The Thai Agreement’s main purpose was to use Thai laws to gag protected public disclosure, or whistleblowing. 

Petroleum Geo-Services (PGS) and the Veneer of Governance (5 May 2016)

PGS and SDK had signed a termination settlement agreement 5 December 2013 (the “Settlement Agreement”) governed by the laws of England.  The Settlement Agreement contains Confidentiality clauses that prohibit parties from publishing disparaging content about one another.  However, there is a provision for protected public disclosure through included reference of the UK Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA).  The Thailand Agreement also prohibited SDK from disparaging PGS.  However, the Thailand Agreement did not provide any exception for protected public disclosure, or whistleblowing.  SDK has contended that the exclusion of such exception for protected public disclosure within the Thai Agreement made such “gagging” terms and conditions unenforceable.  Nevertheless, Duensing – Kippen continued to deliver such notices in Thailand.

I am a USA citizen and could not remain in Thailand indefinitely. What’s wrong with non-disparagement clauses within the Settlement Agreement signed 5 December 2013?

PGS’ UK subsidiary Head of Legal, John Francas, is now trying to enforce the terms and conditions of the Thai Agreement outside of Thailand through sending the Notice of breach of Compromise Agreement.  SDK has never accepted the validity of the Thai Agreement, most notably because of the omission of terms and conditions regarding protected disclosure.  SDKs employment contract was governed by the laws of England and allowed protected public disclosure under PIDA., the target of SDK whistleblowing was PGS ASA, a Norwegian corporation governed by the laws of Norway.

In Norway, whistleblowing is protected through the Working Environment Act 2005 (the “WEA”).  Retaliation against an employee who makes use of this right and reports on censurable conditions in the organization is specifically prohibited by the WEA.  Whistleblowing in Norway is defined as “reporting cases of blameworthy conditions that includes illegal, unethical, immoral, or illegitimate matters.  PIDA (especially Clause 43J) and WEA have been the topic within most of the e-mail correspondence to Duensing – Kippen and PGS.  This includes before, during and following the signing of the Thai Agreement.

Working Environment Act 2005

Section 2 A-2 Protection against retaliation in connection with notification

(1) Retaliation against an employee who notifies pursuant to section 2 A-1 is prohibited. As regards workers hired from temporary-work agencies, the prohibition shall apply to both employers and hirers. If the employee submits information that gives reason to believe that retaliation in breach of the first or second sentence has taken place, it shall be assumed that such retaliation has taken place unless the employer or hirer substantiates otherwise.

(2) The first paragraph applies correspondingly in connection with retaliation against an employee who makes known that the right to notify pursuant to section 2 A-1 will be invoked, for example by providing information.

(3) Anyone who has been subjected to retaliation in breach of the first or second paragraph may claim compensation without regard to the fault of the employer or hirer. The compensation shall be fixed at the amount the court deems reasonable in view of the circumstances of the parties and other facts of the case. Compensation for financial loss may be claimed pursuant to the normal rules.

PGS have intentionally misrepresented legal protected public disclosure, as defined by both PIDA and WEA as criminal defamation in Thailand.  SDK being a whistleblower has been emphasized within e-mails and blog posts since long before the delivery of the Thai Claims.  SDK was compelled to sign the Thai Agreement to avoid proceeding through two (2) criminal trials in Thailand.  SDK never recanted that his published content was protected and further more never regarded the contents as untrue or defamatory, this includes up until and past 11 November 2018.

PGS, WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS DUENSING – KIPPEN

On 15 November 2018, out of desperation, SDK wrote a whistleblowing e-mail to JOGMEC (Japan Oil Gas and Metals Corporation) who had recently shortlisted PGS ASA to purchase a seismic vessel. 

The email to JOGMEC stated:

Date: Thu, Nov 15, 2018

Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation
Thank you for contacting us.

The following inquiries were received.

Subject
Other

Your request or question
Business Ethics:

Please remove Petroleum Geo-Services ASA (PGS) from your consideration for the vessel sale and support contract

I am a whistleblower and have for over three years voiced my concerns about PGS board and management corruption and fraud. 

I am a USA citizen who worked for the business unit in the UK.  I now live in Thailand.  Recently, PGS engaged in litigation in THAILAND against me to silence me.  They have never addressed directly my claims of corruption, but instead engaged in threatening litigation to silence critics of health and safety and other practices.  I had published numerous blog articles on nopgs.com.  Nopgs.com is now offline due to this threatened litigation.  One of my publications was an open letter to the PGS board of directors.  Another publication called for the boycott of PGS.  These publications began over three years ago.  PGS refuses to address their internal corrupt business practices.  PGS violates their own Core Values and the principles of the UN Global Compact.  I have also written about this.

Country
Thailand

Name
Steven Kalavity

Company name
Marine Seismic Survey

Somehow, PGS agents were made aware of this new protected disclosure and stated that I had breached the terms and conditions of the recently signed Thailand Agreement.  PGS, again ignoring the laws of Norway and England, threatened new criminal prosecution.  SDK tried to recant the new whistleblowing claims of the earlier email to JOGMEC, but it was too late. 

Date: Fri, Nov 16, 2018

Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation
Thank you for contacting us.

The following inquiries were received.
http://www.jogmec.go.jp/english/

Subject
Other

Your request or question
I sent an earlier mail
And I did not know you would disclose this communication to Petroleum Geo-Services

However, I have agreed to a compromise agreement with Petroleum Geo-Services processed in Thailand that will come into affect 19 November 2018
and I should have not related any matters to you 

I have agreed to unpublish my posts and take down a website critical of PGS
 

So, I apologize for announcing to you this information


Under the terms of the pending agreement, I should not have contacted you
So, please disregard the previous communication.  Matters have been settled

Petroleum Geo-Services and I have agreed to stop


Best regards,
Steven

Steven Kalavity

Country
Thailand

Name
Steven Kalavity

Company name
Marine Seismic Survey

PGS, through Duensing – Kippen, scheduled new criminal proceedings for 29 January 2019.  In the interim, SDK would have to wait for a decision as for whether or not these proceedings would proceed or if PGS would accept the Thailand Agreement.  SDK had taken nopgs.com offline (and listed the site for sale) as part of the terms and conditions of the Thai Agreement.  However, from 1 – 10 December 2018, SDK was ordained a Thai monk at the behest of his Thai family to earn merit.  While SDK was a monk and not accessing his websites and online content, nopgs.com was stolen and SDK lost access to the content.  I mentioned this to my Thai lawyer, but remained remarkably unconcerned.  PGS agreed to allow SDK to write an apology letter so that the criminal proceedings would not progress.

18 January 2019

To PGS Exploration (UK) Limited and Mr. Carl Richards,

Please accept my apology for the offensive content which I have published on-line over the years and for directing such content through e-mails, especially once a compromise agreement was me.

I am hopeful that we can put these matters behind us and that I can focus on my family.

Sincerely SDK

However, I believe this was illegal domain theft and the destruction of evidence, since the principal site that published the “disputed” content was nopgs.com.  Nopgs.com remains pertinent for any continued litigation in either Thailand or the USA (e.g., Harris County, Texas).  The Thai Agreement does not reference specific content nor even the specific claim document(s). 

SDK was essentially held hostage in Thailand due to the litigation.  My marriage visa expired in February 2019 and I would not be able to remain in Thailand indefinitely.  PGS agreements cannot supersede governments rights to grant permission to enter Thailand.  PGS has been overstepping their legal authority by both expecting and later demanding that their “legal notices” be received and acknowledged.  PGS has never sent SDK the actual claims by e-mail, the manner designated within the Thai Agreement.  Apparently, PGS sends claims in English from England to Duensing – Kippen in Thailand to be translated and delivered to relatives of SDK, since SDK is not a citizen of Thailand and no longer resides in Thailand.  PGS is aware of this.

Historical Listing of Blog Articles

###

Attention Norway’s PGS ASA: Notice of breach of Contract

Notice of breach of 5 December 2013 Settlement Contract

to:John Francas <[email protected]>,
GDPR <[email protected]>,
Carl Richards <[email protected]>,
[email protected]
cc:[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected]
date:Apr 27, 2020, 1:53 PM

Under the terms of a Settlement Contract between PGS Exploration (UK) Limited (PGS) and Steven D Kalavity dated 5 December 2013 (the “Settlement Contract”), PGS agreed not publish or cause to be published any statement (whether of fact or opinion) which directly or indirectly disparages, is harmful to or damages the reputation or standing of the Employee.

Settlement Contract Confidentiality Clause 9.7:

9.7          In consideration for the obligations entered into by the Employee in this Clause 9, the Company agrees to make reasonable efforts:

Settlement Agreement Confidentiality Clause 9.7

(a)           neither to make nor publish, nor cause to be made or published, to anyone in any circumstances any statement (whether of fact or opinion) which directly or indirectly disparages, is harmful to or damages the reputation or standing of the Employee (save as may be required by law or regulation), nor to represent the Employee as an authorized agent/employee or otherwise of the Company once his employment has ended, and

Settlement Agreement Confidentiality Clause 9.7(a)

(b)           to keep the existence and terms of this Agreement and the circumstances giving rise to its making confidential and not to disclose, communicate or otherwise make public these terms to any third party save and except as required by law or regulation, or in confidence to its professional advisers.

Settlement Agreement Confidentiality Clause 9.7(B)

PGS has also breached the Settlement Contract Confidentiality clause 9.6 through misrepresenting protected public disclosure as criminal defamation in Thailand.  PGS has not followed policy or whistleblower procedures.  PGS has illegally retaliated against a whistleblower through these intentional breaches.  

Settlement Contract Confidentiality Clause 9.6:

9.6          Nothing in this Clause 9 shall prevent the Employee from disclosing information which he is entitled to disclose under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998, provided that the disclosure is made in accordance with the provisions of that Act and the Employee has complied with the Company’s policy from time to time regarding such disclosure.

Settlement Contract Confidentiality Clause 9.6

The Settlement Contract was referenced to be legally affirmed and valid by PGS within the 16 July 2018 response to the SDK submitted subject access request (2018 SAR Response). 

Thai Criminal case number 2551/2561 claim document (“PGS Thai Claim”) was signed and dated by PGS directors: Rune Olav Pedersen, Gottfred Langseth, and Christin Steen-Nilsen 10 July 2018.  PGS directors also affirmed the Settlement Contract.

Therefore, the PGS Thai Claim constitutes a material breach of the Settlement Contract by PGS.  The PGS Thai Claim is not a valid legal instrument.

SDK is demanding the withdrawal of all claims and contracts that are a derivative of PGS ASA breaching the Settlement Contract. 

Regards,

SDK

###

PGS ASAs John Francas and Lars Mysen cannot Prove Defamation with Forgeries

EXPLAIN THE 25 OCTOBER 2013 MEMO PGS ASA: [email protected], [email protected] DUENSING – KIPPEN (OLAF DUENSING and TIPPAYA MOONMANEE) WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS: [email protected],

PGS ASA: [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]

EXPLAIN THE 25 OCTOBER 2013 MEMO DUENSING – KIPPEN (OLAF DUENSING and TIPPAYA MOONMANEE) PGS ASA: [email protected], [email protected] WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS: [email protected], PGS ASA: [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]

John Francas / PGS ASA have never cited a breach in the Confidentiality clauses of SDK – PGS Exploration (UK) Limited contracts (2010 & 2013) prohibiting disparaging parties. However, SDK cites several PGS ASA breaches in these agreements!

John Francas, PGS UK Head of Legal, Ignorance and the Fraud of Omission (4 October 2019)

What’s wrong with English contracts governed by the laws of England, PGS?

18 U.S. Code § 876.Mailing threatening communications
(b)Whoever, with intent to extort from any person any money or other thing of value, so deposits, or causes to be delivered, as aforesaid, any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of the addressee or of another, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

NORWAY’S PGS ASA EXPORTS CORRUPTION and BRIBES DUENSING – KIPPEN in THAILAND because PGS ASA has NO Evidence of DEFAMATION in UK

EXPLAIN THE 25 OCTOBER 2013 MEMO DUENSING – KIPPEN (OLAF DUENSING and TIPPAYA MOONMANEE) PGS ASA: [email protected], [email protected] WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS: [email protected], PGS ASA: [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
EXPLAIN THE 25 OCTOBER 2013 MEMO DUENSING – KIPPEN (OLAF DUENSING and TIPPAYA MOONMANEE) PGS ASA: [email protected], [email protected] WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS: [email protected], PGS ASA: [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]

USA FEDERAL LAW VIOLATIONS – RACKETEERING INFLUENCED and CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT (RICO)

18 U.S. Code § 912.Officer or employee of the United States
Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
EXPLAIN THE 25 OCTOBER 2013 MEMO DUENSING – KIPPEN (OLAF DUENSING and TIPPAYA MOONMANEE) PGS ASA: [email protected], [email protected] WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS: [email protected], PGS ASA: [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
EXPLAIN THE 25 OCTOBER 2013 MEMO DUENSING – KIPPEN (OLAF DUENSING and TIPPAYA MOONMANEE) PGS ASA: [email protected], [email protected] WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS: [email protected], PGS ASA: [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]

DON’T LET NORWAY’S PGS ASA EXPORT CORRUPTION to THAILAND

PINTEREST KNOW NORWAY’s PGS and THAILANDS DUENSING – KIPPEN IN PICTURES
EXPLAIN THE 25 OCTOBER 2013 MEMO DUENSING – KIPPEN (OLAF DUENSING and TIPPAYA MOONMANEE)
Petroleum Geo-Services (PGS) Mob Gaslighting
EXPLAIN THE 25 OCTOBER 2013 MEMO DUENSING – KIPPEN (OLAF DUENSING and TIPPAYA MOONMANEE) PGS ASA: [email protected], [email protected] WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS: [email protected], PGS ASA: [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]

PGS ASA and Duensing – Kippen Broke USA Federal Law and Illegally Copied SDK Passport to Stalk and Harass SDK and form an ILLEGAL FALSE CLAIM. PGS ASA want SDK to STOP Legally Protected WHISTLEBLOWING. PGS ASA wants SDK to Destroy Evidence of PGS ASA CRIMES!

###

Response to PGS ASA Notice of breach of Compromise Agreement

Discovery in Texas: Investigate and Prepare for Trial

PGS ASA: Explain the 25 Oct MEMO!

to:John Francas <[email protected]>
cc:[email protected],
GDPR <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected]
date:Apr 23, 2020, 9:03 AM
subject:Re: Notice of breach of Compromise Agreement

The Thai Litigation Criminal Claim Leading to the Compromise Agreement Included Reference to an Unanswered “Open Letter to the PGS ASA Board of Directors.” The PGS ASA General Counsel, Lars Mysen, signed-off on the Thai Claim (s). PGS ASA Board of Directors (of a Norwegian Company) are the Plaintiffs

PGS ASA/John Francas,

This is acknowledgement that I received, by e-mail,  the Notice of breach of Compromise Agreement, dated 23 April 2020, (the “Thailand Extortion”)

The Thailand Extortion does not reference a physical address for legal correspondence, but only an e-mail address (Clause 3).  PGS ASA / John Francas were notified 3 July 2019 that I was not residing in Thailand.  Why has PGS ASA delivered firm copies of legal document to an address in Thailand?

Would you please send me notarized copies of the referenced Thailand Extortion that Steven D. Kalavity signed?

Also, please send details and legal credentials of the agent(s) representing PGS Exploration (UK) Limited for PGS ASAs claims in the USA/Texas.

Please send me acknowledgement and responses to the e-mails sent to PGS ASA agents following the delivery of the summons (13 September 2018) and the signing of the Thailand Extortion  ([11 November 2018 “Compromise Agreement”]).

As you know, I was employed by PGS ASAs USA subsidiary in Houston, Texas.

I would also like to receive copies of the employment contracts signed between myself and PGS Exploration (UK) Limited in 2010 and 2013 (advised by legal firm Watson, Farley & Williams (the “UK Legal Contracts“).

What is the status of the UK Legal Contracts in context to the Thailand Extortion?  Please also send me confirmation of PGS ASA employee, Gareth Jones, legal agency (employer) from 2013 – 2020?   

Please send a copy of my PGS ASA personnel file, which is the predicate behind all my online publications.

The Thailand Extortion is being prosecuted on behalf of PGS Exploration (UK) Limited directors, Gottfred Langseth, Christin Steen-Nilsen, and Rune Olav Pedersen. Please correct me if I am wrong, but PGS ASAs USA subsidiary, Petroleum Geo-Services, Inc., Houston, Texas has directors Gottfred Langseth, Christin Steen-Nilsen and Jon Erik Reinhardsen, who have legal fiduciary responsibilities for PGS ASA USA matters? 

Similarly, please send credentials and authorization of PGS Exploration (UK) Limited agent Duensing – Kippen to draft legal agreements for adjudication in the Federal Courts of Harris County, Texas, USA.

PGS ASA has not yet acknowledged my submitted [subject access request] 15 April 2020.  Please do so, and I would also like PGS ASA to respond to subsequent e-mail correspondence, especially the e-mail sent 22 April 2020.

Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail, as well.

Regards,

SDK

—————-

More PGA ASA Blackmail / Extortion ….

Dear Mr Kalavity

Notice of Breach of Compromise Agreement

Under the terms of a Compromise Agreement of Criminal Case between PGS Exploration (UK) (PGS) Limited and Steven D Kalavity dated 9 November 2011 (the “Compromise Agreement”), you agreed that you would not publish or cause to be published the Publication or similar content on any website, social media platform or any other digital or physical media including, without limitation, by email.

You breached the Compromise Agreement in 2018 and you received notices to that effect pursuant to Clause 3 of the Compromise Agreement on 30 April 2019 and 7 May 2019 instructing you to remove or amend such material. You did not do so. As such PGS are taking civil and criminal proceedings against you in Thailand, as we are entitled to do under Clause 6 of the Compromise Agreement. Note that in the event PGS prevail in such proceedings against you, you will be liable to PGS on an indemnity basis for PGS’s full legal costs. This will be enforced against you as a debt.

You have published the Publication and more similar content in breach of Clause 2 of the Compromise agreement on your websites www.marineseismicsurvey.com and www.nopgs.org.

This email constitutes notice in accordance with our obligations under Clause 3 of the Compromise Agreement. PGS hereby notifies you in accordance with Clause 3 of the Compromise Agreement that publishing of the material on
www.marineseismicsurvey.com and www.nopgs.org is a breach of Clause 2 of the Compromise Agreement and must be removed from those websites. You have three (3) days to comply with this notice by removing the material or amending it so that it does not mention PGS or its Affiliates or employees.

Under Clause 4 of the Compromise Agreement you agreed to pay a penalty of USD $50,000, which shall constitute a debt from you to PGS. In the event that the material has not been removed by 2 pm UK time on 26 April 2020, PGS shall without further notice to you instigate debt recovery proceedings against you for all penalty sums due to PGS occasioned by this and your previous violations of Clause 2. Such proceedings may include bankruptcy proceedings available to PGS under relevant applicable laws.

In addition to proceedings against you in Thailand, we reserve the right to issue further proceedings against you in Texas for breach of contract in accordance with our rights under Clause 6 of the Compromise Agreement. Note that in the event PGS prevail in these further proceedings against you, you will be liable to PGS on an indemnity basis for PGS’s full legal costs. This, again, will be enforced against you as a debt.

For and on behalf of PGS Exploration (UK) Limited

###

Response to PGS ASA Notice of breach of Compromise Agreement

PGS ASA: Explain the 25 Oct MEMO!

to:John Francas <[email protected]>
cc:[email protected],
GDPR <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected]
date:Apr 23, 2020, 9:03 AM
subject:Re: Notice of breach of Compromise Agreement

The Thai Litigation Criminal Claim Leading to the Compromise Agreement Included Reference to an Unanswered “Open Letter to the PGS ASA Board of Directors.” The PGS ASA General Counsel, Lars Mysen, signed-off on the Thai Claim (s). PGS ASA Board of Directors (of a Norwegian Company) are the Plaintiffs

PGS ASA/John Francas,

This is acknowledgement that I received, by e-mail,  the Notice of breach of Compromise Agreement, dated 23 April 2020, (the “Thailand Extortion”)

The Thailand Extortion does not reference a physical address for legal correspondence, but only an e-mail address (Clause 3).  PGS ASA / John Francas were notified 3 July 2019 that I was not residing in Thailand.  Why has PGS ASA delivered firm copies of legal document to an address in Thailand?

Would you please send me notarized copies of the referenced Thailand Extortion that Steven D. Kalavity signed?

Also, please send details and legal credentials of the agent(s) representing PGS Exploration (UK) Limited for PGS ASAs claims in the USA/Texas.

Please send me acknowledgement and responses to the e-mails sent to PGS ASA agents following the delivery of the summons (13 September 2018) and the signing of the Thailand Extortion  ([11 November 2018 “Compromise Agreement”]).

As you know, I was employed by PGS ASAs USA subsidiary in Houston, Texas.

I would also like to receive copies of the employment contracts signed between myself and PGS Exploration (UK) Limited in 2010 and 2013 (advised by legal firm Watson, Farley & Williams (the “UK Legal Contracts“).

What is the status of the UK Legal Contracts in context to the Thailand Extortion?  Please also send me confirmation of PGS ASA employee, Gareth Jones, legal agency (employer) from 2013 – 2020?   

Please send a copy of my PGS ASA personnel file, which is the predicate behind all my online publications.

The Thailand Extortion is being prosecuted on behalf of PGS Exploration (UK) Limited directors, Gottfred Langseth, Christin Steen-Nilsen, and Rune Olav Pedersen. Please correct me if I am wrong, but PGS ASAs USA subsidiary, Petroleum Geo-Services, Inc., Houston, Texas has directors Gottfred Langseth, Christin Steen-Nilsen and Jon Erik Reinhardsen, who have legal fiduciary responsibilities for PGS ASA USA matters? 

Similarly, please send credentials and authorization of PGS Exploration (UK) Limited agent Duensing – Kippen to draft legal agreements for adjudication in the Federal Courts of Harris County, Texas, USA.

PGS ASA has not yet acknowledged my submitted [subject access request] 15 April 2020.  Please do so, and I would also like PGS ASA to respond to subsequent e-mail correspondence, especially the e-mail sent 22 April 2020.

Please acknowledge receipt of this e-mail, as well.

Regards,

SDK

—————-

Dear Mr Kalavity

Notice of Breach of Compromise Agreement

Under the terms of a Compromise Agreement of Criminal Case between PGS Exploration (UK) (PGS) Limited and Steven D Kalavity dated 9 November 2011 (the “Compromise Agreement”), you agreed that you would not publish or cause to be published the Publication or similar content on any website, social media platform or any other digital or physical media including, without limitation, by email.

You breached the Compromise Agreement in 2018 and you received notices to that effect pursuant to Clause 3 of the Compromise Agreement on 30 April 2019 and 7 May 2019 instructing you to remove or amend such material. You did not do so. As such PGS are taking civil and criminal proceedings against you in Thailand, as we are entitled to do under Clause 6 of the Compromise Agreement. Note that in the event PGS prevail in such proceedings against you, you will be liable to PGS on an indemnity basis for PGS’s full legal costs. This will be enforced against you as a debt.

You have published the Publication and more similar content in breach of Clause 2 of the Compromise agreement on your websites www.marineseismicsurvey.com and www.nopgs.org.

This email constitutes notice in accordance with our obligations under Clause 3 of the Compromise Agreement. PGS hereby notifies you in accordance with Clause 3 of the Compromise Agreement that publishing of the material on
www.marineseismicsurvey.com and www.nopgs.org is a breach of Clause 2 of the Compromise Agreement and must be removed from those websites. You have three (3) days to comply with this notice by removing the material or amending it so that it does not mention PGS or its Affiliates or employees.

Under Clause 4 of the Compromise Agreement you agreed to pay a penalty of USD $50,000, which shall constitute a debt from you to PGS. In the event that the material has not been removed by 2 pm UK time on 26 April 2020, PGS shall without further notice to you instigate debt recovery proceedings against you for all penalty sums due to PGS occasioned by this and your previous violations of Clause 2. Such proceedings may include bankruptcy proceedings available to PGS under relevant applicable laws.

In addition to proceedings against you in Thailand, we reserve the right to issue further proceedings against you in Texas for breach of contract in accordance with our rights under Clause 6 of the Compromise Agreement. Note that in the event PGS prevail in these further proceedings against you, you will be liable to PGS on an indemnity basis for PGS’s full legal costs. This, again, will be enforced against you as a debt.

For and on behalf of PGS Exploration (UK) Limited

###

English English Français Français 日本語 日本語 Norsk bokmål Norsk bokmål Português Português ไทย ไทย